Comments on: Overpayments http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/overpayments/ Hamilton House, 1 Temple Avenue, London, EC4Y 0HA. Tel: 020 7489 2165 Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:55:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Employment Law Advocates ¬ª Blog Archive ¬ª Overpayments « Employment Law http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/overpayments/#comment-385 Employment Law Advocates ¬ª Blog Archive ¬ª Overpayments « Employment Law Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:07:49 +0000 http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/?p=779#comment-385 [...] Mo­­r­e h­er­e: Em­pl­o­ym­ent L­aw Ad­vo­c­ates­ ¬ª Bl­o­g&#... [...] [...] Mo­­r­e h­er­e: Em­pl­o­ym­ent L­aw Ad­vo­c­ates­ ¬ª Bl­o­g&#… [...]

]]> By: James Medhurst http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/overpayments/#comment-382 James Medhurst Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:38:02 +0000 http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/?p=779#comment-382 Hi Stephen. Thanks for posting but what I really want is a copy of the judgment in this Employment Tribunal case. Hi Stephen. Thanks for posting but what I really want is a copy of the judgment in this Employment Tribunal case.

]]> By: Stephen Davis http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/overpayments/#comment-380 Stephen Davis Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:09:33 +0000 http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/?p=779#comment-380 I found a copy of the judgement here: http://www.emplaw.co.uk/researchfree-redirector.aspx?StartPage=data%2f20312142.htm I found a copy of the judgement here:

http://www.emplaw.co.uk/researchfree-redirector.aspx?StartPage=data%2f20312142.htm

]]> By: James Medhurst http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/overpayments/#comment-360 James Medhurst Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:56:59 +0000 http://www.employmentlawadvocates.com/?p=779#comment-360 Looking at some of the other coverage in the media, I am now wondering whether the tribunal used restitution at all. It may have come to the conclusion that the contract stating £19,000 should be treated as an offer because it objectively resembled an offer even though no offer was intended. This is possible but would be an extreme and unusual finding and, to make it, the tribunal would not be able to take into account things that happened after the agreement was made, such as the fact that the error was not noticed for three years, or the fact that the higher salary was included in a reference for a mortgage, both of which have been given prominence in the press. I would dearly love to see a copy of the judgment for this case. Looking at some of the other coverage in the media, I am now wondering whether the tribunal used restitution at all. It may have come to the conclusion that the contract stating £19,000 should be treated as an offer because it objectively resembled an offer even though no offer was intended. This is possible but would be an extreme and unusual finding and, to make it, the tribunal would not be able to take into account things that happened after the agreement was made, such as the fact that the error was not noticed for three years, or the fact that the higher salary was included in a reference for a mortgage, both of which have been given prominence in the press. I would dearly love to see a copy of the judgment for this case.

]]>