Get in touch
020 7489 2165
info@employmentlawadvocates.com
Employment Law Advocates
Hamilton House
1 Temple Avenue
London
EC4Y 0HA
There has been an interesting recent judgment from the Court of Appeal, reversing the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Oakland v Wellswood (the link is to the now overruled judgment). The case is unusual because the insolvency issue did not arise in the context of an employee who had been made redundant immediately afterwards but rather someone who had been transferred to a new company but then dismissed less than a year later. Therefore, the question which arose was whether service with the old company could be taken into account in considering his continuity of employment.
Because of these facts, the Court of Appeal did not need to consider TUPE at all in making its decision. As a result of section 218(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, continuity of employment is preserved where there is a transfer from one employer to another, whether or not TUPE applies. Therefore, there was jurisdiction for a claim of unfair dismissal and it did not matter that the point was not argued below.
Nevertheless, the obiter comments of their Lord Justices may prove to be more significant. By virtue of regulation 8(7) of TUPE, the regulations do not apply¬†to insolvency proceedings¬†instituted¬†with a view to liquidation of the¬†assets of a company.¬†Judge Peter Clark at the EAT concluded that this includes “pre-pack” administrations where an administrator is appointed solely for the purpose of selling the company assets to a new company before liquidation is commenced. This would seem to be an easy way¬†to avoid the effects of TUPE and, with respect to¬†Judge Clark, it does not really promote a rescue culture because of the frequency with which pre-packs are used by owners to sell businesses to themselves.
In any event, the Court of Appeal doubted that regulation 8(7) would apply in these circumstances and, although it was not necessary to resolve the case, it is likely that their approach will be followed in the future. As usual, I shall be posting a link to the judgment on this blog as soon as it is published online.
Our office will be closing for the holiday period at 12.00pm on Friday 23rd December 2011 and will reopen again until 10.00am on Tuesday 3rd January 2012. Advocates will ...
Follow us on Twitter @employmentlawad
An important decision was handed down by the Supreme Court yesterday when it overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of G) v The Governors ...
020 7489 2165
info@employmentlawadvocates.com
Employment Law Advocates
Hamilton House
1 Temple Avenue
London
EC4Y 0HA